| Stock Ticker |
| LivePerson | 2.85 |  | 0.18 |
| Selectica | 1.16 | | 0.07 |
| ICT | 9.15 | | 0.55 |
| Interactive | 11.01 | | 0.49 |
| SupportSoft | 3.62 | | 0.14 |
| Vignette | 12.26 | | 0.45 |
| ClickSoftware | 2.46 | | 0.07 |
| Salesforce | 69.5 | | 1.88 |
| Oracle | 23.37 | | 0.62 |
| Convergys | 13.84 | | 0.34 |
| Epicor | 7.25 | | 0.16 |
| NetSuite | 16 | | 0.3 |
| Rainmaker | 3.23 | | 0.06 |
| eLoyalty | 5.59 | | 0.07 |
| ATG | 4.17 | | 0.05 |
| Teletech | 15.99 | | 0.19 |
| Nortel | 5.99 | | 0.07 |
| Amdocs | 30.86 | | 0.36 |
| RightNow | 16.71 | | 0.17 |
| Chordiant | 6.27 | | 0.06 |
| Pegasystems | 14.89 | | 0.14 |
| CDC | 3.07 | | 0.02 |
| NCR | 26.22 | | 0.08 |
| Sykes | 19.81 | | 0.06 |
| SPSS | 33.9 | | 0.09 |
| Intervoice | 8.21 | | 0.01 |
| HP | 45.47 |  | -0.04 |
| Tekelc | 16.83 | | -0.02 |
| NICE | 28.11 | | -0.36 |
| APAC | 1.47 | | -0.02 |
| SAP | 57.45 | | -0.84 |
| Astea | 3.59 | | -0.09 |
| Unica | 8.3 | | -0.42 |
|
As of 4:00 p.m. on 8/7/08 |
|
| |
 "Our Take"
| |
"Our Take"
"Our Take" is a collection of daily
vignettes covering a wide range of CRM topics. It's an attempt to add our own spin to the world of CRM. We will use the column to share our perspectives, opinions,
epiphanies, web nuggets, or quite frankly anything that moves us. Get ready to expect the unexpected. And, don't be shy about sharing your thoughts.
|
2/6/08 - Can You Afford to Buy?
Conventional wisdom suggests buying off the shelf software is more economical than writing your own code. I wholeheartedly agree with the statement under one specific condition - your company needs the majority of the functionality provided by the packaged software. Typically, you pay the same price for a particular software product regardless if you use 10 or 100 of the features. Consider, this reader's thoughts:
"We had a 'buy if we can, build if we can't' attitude for several years, until we saw the real total cost of ownership (TCO). You pay for the product, add in a small fortune to install the product, include ever spiraling yearly licensing fees, support that reaches mediocre on it's best days, and forced upgrades with their associated costs, and you start to see the build side become much more attactive. When you build it yourself, you do not have a vendor to call if there is a problem, but you do have the source and people in-house, available now instead of in a few weeks, when the vendor's short support staff finally gets back to you."
The level of frustration is obvious. It is difficult to determine the buy versus build decision for this particular situation or any situation. Have you ever thought about determine the percentage of features used versus not used? If you are using less than half the feature set, are you paying more than double?
Gary Lemke, Publisher
(Share your thoughts)
| |
|
